🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, the average family pays $27,000 annually for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker earning moderate income pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you compare it to what the typical American pays. I know multiple clients that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When including those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

In the US, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of federal military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make administration much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would still be a superior and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect amid current situation is that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.